Landmark Links August 5th – Suicide Pact

Niagra Falls

Lead Story… Vancouver is about to tank it’s residential real estate market after they instituted an astronomical 15% tax on real estate purchases by foreigners.  The worst part may be that existing contracts were not grandfathered in to the new law.  This led to a near-shutdown of the BC land registration system as realtors worked overtime to close before the tax took effect.  Going forward, many of the escrows that didn’t close are likely to fall out as the tax proceeds will exceed released deposits by a substantial amount in some cases.  The impact of such a tax will have massive and chaotic impact as it reverberates through the greater Vancouver market and could become a text book example of the old saying: “be careful what you ask for because you just might get it.” (h/t Darren Fancher) See Also: How Chinese billionaires fueled the epic Vancouver real estate boom.  As a point of reference for just how hot the Vancouver real estate market has been, this picture is worth more than 1,000 words:

Vancouver housing prices

Economy

Aging in Place: Americans over 65 (and increasingly over 75 as well) are staying in the work force well into their retirement years and it’s often about more than just cash flow.  Contra: Aging  US population is hurting both productivity and workforce growth as baby boomers retire.

Bass Ackwards: The best paid CEOs run some of the worst performing companies.

Commercial

Bad Optics: At it’s best, the EB-5 Visa Program, which allows qualified, wealthy foreigners to obtain a green card in exchange for investing $500k or more in a job creating enterprise is a win-win for both investors and developers.  However, the program hasn’t been without controversy and new allegations of developers defrauding foreign investors are not going to help.

Taking Matters Into Their Own Hands: Facebook pledged to build at least 1,500 apartment units for the general public (not including housing for FB employees) in Silicon Valley.  The social media giant is becoming an apartment developer in an attempt to generate support for it’s expansion plans, which call for an adding 6,500 new employees in an already dramatically under-supplied Bay Area market.

Let’s Make a Deal: As new apartments flood the downtown LA market, landlords are increasingly offering rent concessions that were nowhere to be found up to recently.

Residential

Chilled: The Manhattan luxury condo glut has led to an ice-cold land market on the formerly red-hot island.

Water, Water Everywhere…: It’s a seller’s housing market but almost no one is selling primarily because it’s hard to find a replacement house, leading to tight inventory.  See Also: Home ownership is now at a 5-decade low.

Profiles

Crash Proof: How driverless cars could threaten insurers’ earnings.

Lurking in the Shadows: Auction house Sothebys is becoming a player in the shadow banking space.

Podcast of the Day: Malcolm Gladwell’s latest Revisionist History podcast is about the true story behind uncontrolled acceleration accusations leveled against Toyota in 2009 that led to a 10 million car recall and $1 billion fine.  The real story is fascinating – Toyota was a scapegoat – and should be a must-listen for anyone who gets behind the wheel.

Chart of the Day

WTF

Roaming Charges: Japanese Olympic gymnast Kohei Uchimura, the defending gold medalist in the men’s all-around competition got hit with a $5,000 phone bill (which his carrier later agreed to reduce substantially) due to the fact that he: 1) Apparently has a Pokemon Go addiction and 2) Didn’t bother to disable the roaming feature on his cell phone while in Brazil. To make matters worse, he had a 0% chance of actually capturing a Pokemon as the game has not yet been released in Brazil.  That’s a painful hit to the wallet but this also feels like a great endorsement opportunity.

Getting Kids Involved in the Political Process: Mayor Anthony Silva of Stockton, CA was recently arrested and charged with providing alcohol to minors at a youth camp that he runs because, well, Stockton.

You Gonna Smoke That? A man from Orlando Florida was recently arrested when police mistook his Krispy Kreme doughnut for meth.  There’s a great cops and doughnuts joke in there somewhere (h/t Chris Gomez-Ortigoza).

Landmark Links – A candid look at the economy, real estate, and other things sometimes related.

Visit us at Landmarkcapitaladvisors.com

Landmark Links August 5th – Suicide Pact

Landmark Links July 29th – Taking Out the Trash

Funny-Garbage-Bin-Fun-And-Education-28-320x240

Lead Story… Regulatory changes are rapidly leading to the demise of one of the seedier portions of the real estate industry: Non-Traded REITs.  I’ve written about Non-Traded REITs a couple of times before.  For those of you not familiar with the product, Investopedia defines a Non-Traded REIT as (emphasis mine):

A form of real estate investment method that is designed to reduce or eliminate tax while providing returns on real estate. A non-traded REIT does not trade on a securities exchange, and because of this it is quite illiquid for long periods of time. Front-end fees can be as much as 15%, much higher than a traded REIT due to its limited secondary market.

Basically, it’s exactly like a traded REIT, only far less liquid and with much, much, much higher fees.  This definition doesn’t even get into the other myriad of above-market management fees that the Non-Traded REIT companies charge their investors.  If you can’t already tell, I’m no fan of this “asset class”…or really any other that exists mostly to enrich sponsors and sales people at the expense of unwitting investors.  That’s why I was incredibly pleased to find an article earlier this week in Investment News entitled Nontraded REIT sales fall off a cliff as industry struggles to adapt outlining how regulator changes have crippled the third-tier brokerages that traditionally fed capital to Non-Traded REITs.  This is not a business with a bright future:

Sales of nontraded real estate investment trusts, the high-commission alternative investments sold primarily by independent broker-dealers, have fallen off a cliff.

Heading into 2016 facing a number of hurdles, namely a flurry of legal and regulatory changes that would quickly impact how brokers sell them, the nontraded REIT industry’s worst fears have come true.

Over the first five months of the year, sales of full-commission REITs, which typically carry a 7% payout to the adviser and 3% commission to the broker-dealer the adviser works for, have dropped a staggering 70.5% when compared with the same period a year earlier, according to Robert A. Stanger & Co. Inc., an investment bank that focuses on nontraded REITs.

Their recent sharp drop in sales is part of a longer cycle. The amount of equity raised, or total sales of nontraded REITs, has been sinking by about $5 billion a year since 2013, when sales hit a high watermark of nearly $20 billion.

Times have changed dramatically. Stanger estimates total nontraded REIT sales in 2016 will reach between $5 billion and $6 billion, or roughly 25% of their level in 2013. That year, former nontraded REIT czar Nicholas Schorsch and his firm, American Realty Capital, were at their zenith, and broker-dealers fattened their bottom lines from REIT commission dollars.

All that has changed as sales of nontraded REITs at independent broker-dealers have dried up. Industry bellwether LPL Financial said in its first-quarter earnings release that commission revenue from alternative investments, the lion’s share of which comes from nontraded REITs, was just $7.8 million, a staggering decline of 86.7% when compared with the first quarter of 2015.

Other broker-dealers are reporting similar results. Sales of nontraded REITs at Geneos Wealth Management are down 60% to 65% year to date, according to Dean Rager, the firm’s senior vice president.

So, what led to fundraising for an investment product like this tanking?  Two new regulations.  The first one, from FINRA introduced a new rule whereby brokers selling illiquid investments need to make pricing transparent.  Seems reasonable.  The second, which will come into effect early next year will introduce a fiduciary standard for brokers working with client retirement accounts as opposed to the lower “suitability” standard currently being used.  Also seems quite reasonable.  The result is a nearly impossible fundraising environment when:

  1. Brokers have to show clients that the fees that they would pay are exorbitant (and there is no way that a broker would sell Non-Traded REIT shares without the high fees); and
  2. There is no chance that a broker can recommend an investment where a return of over 17% must be achieved just in order to break even by offsetting the 10% broker fee and up-to 5% upfront fee to the Non-Traded REIT sponsor.

If this industry is going to survive, it will need to change substantially, meaning lower fees and far more transparency.  The thing is that, at a certain point, there is basically no reason for it to exist since investors can always buy far more liquid Traded REITs.  The good news is that would-be investors are far less likely to be taken to the cleaners.  The other good news is that there are other real estate alternatives with a far better alignment of interest between investor and sponsor that will likely to be the beneficiary of capital that would have otherwise gone into Non-Traded REITs.  Good riddance.

Economy

Yield Curve Update: The yield curve continues to contract.  However, unlike in past cycles, it may not be signalling a recession and instead a response to the international hunt for yield spurred on by negative interest rates and foreign economic chaos.  Either way, it doesn’t give the Federal Reserve much latitude.

And You Think We’re Bad: The incredible story of how Italian banks used high pressure sales to entice Italian households to load up on their risky subordinate debt during the financial crisis, imperiling their economy today.

Residential

This is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things (or Affordable Housing): …..At least not in San Francisco.  A proposed housing development in the Mission district lost 85 percent of it’s unit count at planning commission, shrinking it from 26 new units to only 4.  The reason: Planning Commission decided that it wanted to preserve the auto body shop that currently resides on the site.  Ironically, the same people opposed to this project will continue to shed crocodile tears about how San Francisco has become un-affordable due to a complete lack of common sense or economic literacy.

Crickets: The lack of affordable housing in the US should be a major campaign issue but neither party seems to want to touch it.

Rocket Fuel: Bay Area private bank lenders are offering wealthy techies 0% down mortgages with low interest rates to buy homes up to $2mm, fueling concern about both bubbles and growing inequality.

Profiles

What’s in a Name?  Lenders are continuing their age-old practice of re-branding loans to high risk borrowers.  B&C lending became stigmatized so they re-branded it “subprime.”  After “subprime” blew up, they started calling it “near-prime.”  When near-near prime doesn’t go well, get ready for not-quite-prime.

The Tortoise and the Hare: Video games that are immediate mega-hits often flame out almost as quickly.  I’m looking at you, Pokemon Go.

The Machine that Builds The Machine: Take a tour through Tesla’s 5.8 million square foot Gifafactory Sparks, Nevada.

Follow Friday: If you’re on Twitter check out @DPRK_News  It’s a satirical North Korean news feed and one of the funniest things I’ve seen.  Here’s a couple of sample tweets:

 

Chart of the Day

This warms my cold heart.

Screen Shot 2016-07-25 at 2.19.21 PM

WTF

Born to Ride: Watch a Walmart customer on a Rascal Scooter rob a store an then get away after ramming an employee into a dumpster with his trusty steed.  When you see what the employees and customers who tried to stop him look like, the fact that he escaped on a Rascal Scooter will make more sense.

Worse Than Tofu: Cockroach milk could be the superfood that the world has been waiting for.  No, this is not from The Onion.

Entrepreneurial Drive: Drug dealers in Rio are selling Olympics branded cocaine to take advantage of their city hosting the games.  Who says there is no economic benefit to hosting the Olympics?

Landmark Links – A candid look at the economy, real estate, and other things sometimes related.

Visit us at Landmarkcapitaladvisors.com

Landmark Links July 29th – Taking Out the Trash

Landmark Links -July 22nd – On the Sidelines

Tebow-Sideline-600x340

Lead Story… CNBC posted a Bankrate.com study this week which found that more Americans prefer cash to stocks or real estate as a means of investment for money they don’t need for 10 years or more.  In other words, a somewhat shocking 54 million American’s are embracing a zero-risk, zero return mentality.  The most troubling finding was this (highlights are mine):

Younger millennials, or those at ages 18 to 25, overwhelmingly chose cash as their preferred investment for they money they would not need for at least 10 years. That was by more than a 2-to-1 margin over the next highest category, real estate. (Millennials are also less likely to own a home because they simply can’t afford one, according to a separate report from the U.K.’s office of National Statistics.)

Older generations were more likely to cite real estate as their top choice for a long-term investment.

What I find so disturbing is that the typical investment paradigm has been turned on it’s head – normally, young people in an asset growth stage should be investing long term assets more aggressively and becoming less aggressive as they age into a wealth preservation stage of life.  When people, young or old start holding long term investable assets in cash, it’s deflationary. This level of risk aversion is also frequently a characteristic of those who have experienced a dramatic financial crisis like the Great Recession or Great Depression.  I wrote about this back in April as it pertained to Millennials not buying homes due to experiences during the housing crash.  However, the bank rate study shows that the risk averse, deflationary mentality extends far beyond the housing sector when it comes to young people and investing.  This brings us to an article by Conor Sen, one of Bloomber View’s excellent new columnists that makes an interesting argument about Millennials and housing.  Sen makes a case that Millennials almost need a housing bubble to come off the sidelines and create demand for new housing, using oil production as an analogy:

To understand the slow-motion trends in single-family housing, start by looking at the oil market: It took years of oil priced around $100 a barrel to spur the investments that drove higher production, leading to the current supply-driven glut and prices closer to $50 a barrel. The levers of supply and demand worked, but they worked slowly — as is happening in the housing market.

Every year since 2009 we’ve been running a housing deficit: More housing for sale has been absorbed than built. With a glut of housing left over from the housing bubble and the great recession, it’s logical that construction of new supply was subdued for a few years. But vacant inventory for sale normalized in 2012, and currently stands at a 12-year low. So why aren’t builders building more? The pace of construction remains far below the rate of household creation.

IMO, it’s an imperfect analogy as it’s likely a bit easier to drill for oil in barren portions of  North Dakota or West Texas than it would be to build a large development with reasonably priced homes (the reasonably priced part is key) in places that they are needed like San Francisco or Los Angeles where discretionary entitlements, environmental regulations and NIMBY activists could tie approvals up for a decade or more.  That being said, a lot of Sen’s thesis is based around economic stagnation due to the lack of wage growth in the construction industry despite a near-record-low unemployment rate  coupled with incredibly low housing inventory:

In response to a nearly generational low in housing inventory and construction worker shortage, one might expect that there would be booming wage growth for construction workers, drawing labor away from other industries. Yet we don’t have conclusive signs of that. Year-over-year wage growth for construction workers is currently 2.7 percent, nearly a full point lower than it was at the same time in the year 2000.

The lack of growth in new construction jobs is sobering. Despite a need for more housing, and despite the labor shortage and the wage growth, construction industry employment fell 6,000 in April and 16,000 in May and showed no growth in June. This is the first time in more than five years that construction employment has shown no growth for three months.

This is all the more perplexing because the cyclical conditions for real estate have rarely been better. In addition to the low level of inventory and rising secular demand as millennials are ready to buy homes, the economy has rising wage growth and historically low levels of interest rates, as I wrote about last week.

Sen concludes that it might take substantial increase in both housing prices and construction wage growth in order to push housing starts to a level where construction adds substantially to GDP and adds enough supply to eventually meet the marketplace demand.  It’s an interesting thought but I doubt that it’s possible (or even desirable) under in our current situation for a few reasons:

  1. The construction needs to take place where it is actually needed and that is more restricted by zoning and local opposition than it is by a labor shortage.  In the oil market, it matters little where the oil comes from so long as there is a way to get it to a refinery and then the end user.  In housing, location is everything.  Unless real demand shifts into outlying suburbs, this will continue to be a problem.
  2. In order to work, substantial credit expansion both to develop/build units and also for purchase mortgages would be needed.  This seems unlikely given current economic conditions, political climate (anti-GSE sentiment) and diminishing affordability.
  3. As seen in the oil industry, there is a fine line between adding enough supply and creating a glut.  When oil prices go down, oil companies, employees, owner of land with reserves and providers of services lose money.  If the housing market were to become too oversupplied and tank again, millions of home owners lose a tremendous amount of equity.  In one case, the loss is felt by a (relative) few.  In the other  it’s impact adversely affects many.
  4. Any significant decrease in prices brought on by a large surge in housing production would typically hurt the people who Sen is saying need help the most: young people and first time buyers since housing credit availability typically contracts when prices fall and lender assets become impaired.  This means that those with stronger credit and more cash (often not entry level buyers) fare better in times when credit becomes restricted.

Again, the concept that housing and the construction industry can respond to surging prices in a similar manner to the oil industry is desirable from an economic perspective. However, I’m not sure how well it plays out in the real world when the regions where housing is needed most are those where it is least likely to be built.  I sincerely hope to be proven wrong in the next few years.

Economy

Interest Rate Roulette: Now that the Brexit vote happened we can revert to normal economic journalism where writers try to predict when/if the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates.  This week, there is disagreement between two of the most astute Fed watchers out there.  John Hilsenrath of the WSJ says that the Fed could raise rates as early as September.  Tim Duy says “no chance” so long as the yield curve continues to compress.

Commercial

Game Changer: Pokemon Go has accomplished something that brick and mortar retailers have dreamed about for years: turning location-aware smart phones into drivers of foot traffic.  The implications for commercial real estate and retail in particular are yuge as Nintendo plans to allow companies to pay up in order to be featured prominently on the game’s virtual map. (h/t Tad Springer)

Residential

Crystal Ball: The Terner Center for Innovative Housing at UC Berkley has come up with an app that allows a developer to input variables for sites and give an indication of whether or not a project will be approved and built. It’s still in beta but the concept is fascinating. (h/t Ingrid Vallon)

Profiles

QOTD: “‘I was collecting Pokémon’ is not a legal defense against a charge of trespass, so be sure that you have permission to enter an area or building.”   – Wyoming, MN police department Twitter account warning Pokémon Go players not to trespass onto others’ property.

Worker’s Paradise: Venezuela has become the poster child for “it can always get worse.” Hugo Chavez’s worker’s paradise has inflation set to top 1,600% next year as well as an epic food shortage crisis.

Success From Scratch: Dollar Shave Club, which just sold to Unilever for $1 billion in cash is the ultimate modern American success story.

Chart of the Day

WTF

A Monkey Walks Into a Bar: A new study found that monkeys are basically furry little drunks. First off I hope this wasn’t funded by tax dollars. Second, if someone wants to buy drinks for me, I can prove that I like to get drunk as well.

Money Well Spent: A woman got stuck in a tree in a NJ cemetery while trying to capture a Pokemon and had to call 911 to have the fire department get her out.  Your tax dollars at work. (h/t Ryland Weber)

Citizen of the Year: A woman in Tennessee witnessed a car crash outside her (likely trailer park) home where the 67-year old driver died on impact.  Rather than calling 911, the woman stole the man’s wallet and used his credit card to buy beer and cigarettes.  People are wonderful.

Video of the Week: Some hipster figured out a backpack that you can carry a cat around in complete with a round submarine window.  Then we wonder why studies say that cats hate their owners.

Landmark Links – A candid look at the economy, real estate, and other things sometimes related.

Visit us at Landmarkcapitaladvisors.com

Landmark Links -July 22nd – On the Sidelines

Landmark Links July 19th – One Size Fits All?

one-size-fits-all-rubber-duck

Lead Story…. Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller wrote a piece in the NY Times this weekend titled: Why Land and Homes Actually Tend to Be Disappointing Investments that caught my eye.  In the article, Professor Shiller discusses both farmland and residential land and makes a case they are both subpar investments over time (highlights are mine):

Over the century from 1915 to 2015, though, the real value of American farmland (deflated by the Consumer Price Index) increased only 3.1 times, according to the Department of Agriculture. That comes to an average increase of only 1.1 percent a year — and with a growing population, that’s barely enough to keep per capita real land value unchanged.

According to my own data (relying on the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, which I helped create), real home prices rose even more slowly over the same period — a total increase of 1.8 times, which comes to an average of only 0.6 percent a year.What all that amounts to is that neither farmland nor housing has been a great place to invest money over the long term.

To put this in perspective, note that the real gross domestic product in the United States grew 15.5 times — or, on average, 3.2 percent a year — from 1929, the year official G.D.P. numbers began to be kept, to 2015. That’s a much higher growth rate than for real estate. But why?  For home prices, a good part of the answer comes from supply and demand. As prices rise, companies build more houses and the supply floods the market, keeping prices down.  

The supply response to increasing demand may help explain why real home prices nationwide fell 35 percent from 2006 to 2012 (and even more in some cities). Investment in residential structures in the United States was at near-record levels as a percentage of G.D.P. just before the price declines. Prices have been rebounding since then — and so has construction of new houses.

 

While the idea of supply and demand balancing out the housing market makes perfect sense from a textbook economic perspective, it quickly falls apart when you take into account the most local of all factors that has quite possibly the largest impact on both land and home prices: politics.  Essentially, there are two primary restrictions to developing more residential units.  The first is geographical.  This includes mountains, bodies of water and scarcity of available water resources for new units.  The second is political.  This includes restrictive zoning, discretionary approval rights, etc.

Shiller’s analysis is perfect for markets with little to no geographical restrictions and even fewer political restrictions.  For example, land and home prices are incredibly stable in a place like Houston, Texas where new homes can be added quickly.  However, it fits poorly in coastal California which is hemmed in by mountains and the pacific ocean, has incredibly restrictive zoning and a populace with political leanings typically hostile to new development.  I was a bit surprised that Shiller wrote this piece as he knows what I just wrote better than anyone.  In fact, the Case Shiller Index that bears his name tracks housing prices in individual cities and backs up what I just wrote.  For example, look no further than the difference between the Case Shiller Chicago Index (the don’t track Houston) and the Case Shiller San Francisco Index to see how land use restrictions can lead to explosive moves in asset pricing when coupled with real economic growth.

Shiller goes on to explain how adding density keeps land and housing prices stable over time (highlights are mine):

Of course, underneath every home is a piece of land. Although that is typically only a bit of former farmland, it is often in an urban or suburban area, where a plot of land tends to cost much more than in the country.

Sometimes that little piece of land dominates the value of the home, particularly in dense urban areas. But if we are to understand long-term trends, we need to realize what land represents, even in Manhattan or Silicon Valley or any booming area. People in such places usually aren’t buying land for its own sake but for the myriad services that housing provides. A home is not just a place to sleep and store clothing and keepsakes. It can be a place that is convenient to a stimulating place of work, good schools and entertainment and, indeed, part of an entire human community.

These services have developed enormously over the last 100 years, changing the spatial and geographic dimensions of housing. There are vastly more highways and automobiles, telephones and various electronic connections, enabling people to leave center cities and still obtain the housing services they want. Thus, from a long-term perspective, these developments relieved a great deal of the upward pressure on home prices in cities.

Right now, there are some interesting developments in the supply of housing services that economize even further on urban land. We have recently seen interest in “micro-apartments,” which may be little more than 200 square feet but manage to squeeze in a kitchen, a bathroom and an entertainment center. For many people, this tiny space, with its proximity to like-minded people, interesting neighborhoods and restaurants, is preferable to living in a house in a far-flung suburb. Carrying this idea further, keepsakes can be kept in remote storage, maybe deliverable someday, on demand, with driverless cars. Already, rules are being changed in many cities, including New York, allowing the little apartments to be built and to accommodate many more people per acre of city land. These factors could lead to near-zero future demands on valuable urban land.

First off, micro-units are wonderful as a means to drive housing prices down for those wishing to live in a high-priced urban area IF AND ONLY IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY ABLE TO GET APPROVALS TO BUILD THEM.  Clearly Professor Shiller has not attempted to get such a micro-unit development approved in a wealthy, coastal region of California – say Orange County, for example.  If a developer were to propose such a thing in a high-priced neighborhood, he’d be run out of town on a rail or worse for even daring to bring it up.  This type of concept that works great in some places (cities without restrictive zoning and economics text books) and not at all in others (pretty much every major city on the west coast and a few on the east coast as well).  In addition, adding density typically results in INCREASING underlying land values rather than causing them to fall. Please note that I’m not disagreeing with Shiller as to the premise of his article from a strictly economic perspective (at least when it comes to homes – not necessarily land) only noting that politics MUST BE taken into account because they play such an out-sized role in some regions.

I am far from an uber-bull when it comes to housing prices.  Trees don’t grow to the sky and asset values can go up in a straight line for an extended period of time.  That line of thinking has been fully debunked by the debacle that was the housing crash and Great Recession.  IMO, one buys a house for stability and as a hedge against future rising rents, especially in supply constrained regions.  If you are looking at a house soley as a means of making a large return on investment, you are doing it wrong.  Unlike say tech stocks, housing is a necessity.  Therefore the only way to properly judge it as an investment is versus the alternative: renting.  You either do better over time as a renter or an owner depending largely on economic and political factors where you live.  All real estate is local and making broad generalizations about housing supply being able to meet demand regardless of location and political climate is next to impossible even for an economist as accomplished as Shiller.

Economy

Bass Ackwards: How negative interest rates have turned the world’s economy upside down.

Delay: Britain has now pushed the projected date of the Brexit back to 2019.  The odds of this thing actually occurring are falling by the day.

Reaching: Someone published a research note on Seeking Alpha theorizing that the Pokemon Go app will lead to higher oil prices.  Color me skeptical.

Commercial 

That Didn’t Take Long: WeWork is cutting it’s revenue forecast and its CEO is asking employees to change it’s “spending culture.”

Residential

Over the Falls: London luxury home sales are plunging post-Brexit.

Profiles

Class Act: Tim Duncan was the greatest basketball player of his generation – sorry Lakers fans but deep down you know its true and not all that close.  True to Duncan’s persona, he left quietly, shunning the typically season-long distraction/going away party that players of his caliber so often demand in the modern era.

Fading Away: Why golf is going the way to the three martini business lunch.

Chart of the Day

The condo development capital stack is becoming a convoluted mess as banks pull back (h/t Tom Farrell).

(Click to enlarge)

WTF

Such a Bummer: McDonalds has stopped allowing customers to stream porn on their free in-store wifi.  It will be interesting to watch how this impacts the bottom line as I’m pretty sure that the free porn was the only reason anyone still went to McDonalds.

Headline of the Year Contender: Woman Decapitated By Passing Train During Sex will be a difficult one to beat.  In a twist that should surprise no-one, this happened in Russia and she was drunk at the time.

Inevitable: Someone shot a gun at a couple of teenagers playing Pokemon Go. Did it happen in Florida? Of course it did.

Landmark Links – A candid look at the economy, real estate, and other things sometimes related.

Visit us at Landmarkcapitaladvisors.com

Landmark Links July 19th – One Size Fits All?

Landmark Links July 15th – Proceeding with Caution

Squirtle

Last Tuesday, I was sitting in a hospital room with a somewhat-drugged-up Mrs. Links just after baby Hayden was born when I read an article about a new video game that had just been released. That game was just beginning to become a phenomenon like nothing I had ever seen.  I remarked to Mrs. Links that this was going to end up being the tech story of the summer.  She rolled her eyes at me in a painkiller-induced haze and told me that I had to be kidding.  I wasn’t.  If I were smart, I would have dropped everything and bought Nintendo stock.  I’m’ not.  Since then the Pokemon phenomenon has taken on a life of it’s own and not just among kids.  Twenty and thirty somethings are playing the augmented reality game which now has more users than Twitter and more engagement than Facebook.  It’s led to car crashes and muggings but has also helped to boost traffic at zoos and museums and is being utilized as a dating app by some.  I’m not a gamer and I personally find the whole thing rather lame (not for kids – for 30 year olds).  I also haven’t downloaded the app and don’t plan to although it has been a regular topic of conversation at Landmark World Headquarters.  However, there is no denying that that this game is dominating the news cycle and having an economic impact on everything from local businesses to real estate (yes, seriously).  As such, today’s blog has decidedly Pokemon Go theme…..and yes, I acknowledge that makes me almost as nerdy as the 30-somethings crowded onto Santa Monica or Newport Piers in search of imaginary cartoon characters that show up on their phones.

Lead Story… Property values in the US have recovered dramatically since housing bottom, leading to an additional $260 billion in home equity.  However, this hasn’t led to additional borrowing.  According to CNBC, this is why:

During the last housing boom, homeowners used their properties like cash machines, pulling out more equity than the house or the market could support. Arguably, no one wants to see that again, and so far, it is not happening.

“During the mid-2000s, as house prices went up, borrowing went up almost dollar for dollar. In the last few years, when house prices have again been increasing more rapidly than the long-term average, mortgage borrowing has not increased at all. In fact it has decreased,” said Sean Becketti, Freddie Mac’s chief economist.

Much of that may be due to more careful lending. The equity may be there, but lenders are far more strict about letting borrowers pull it out, especially if their incomes don’t support the higher debt.

“We are hoping that people continue to be prudent about cashing out, but part of it is, lenders are more cautious. One of our frustrations at Freddie Mac is we think we’ve set a very prudent credit box, but we find that lenders won’t go all the way out to the edge of our credit box. They are more restrictive than we would allow them to be. They just are super cautious,” added Becketti.

Mortgage refinances will likely rise on lower rates, but the same volatile global economic conditions pushing rates down are making borrowers even more cautious. The cash-out share is not expected to change, as lenders keep standards high and homeowners keep their personal leverage in check.

Economy

Vortex: How the black hole of negative rates is dragging down yields across asset classes and around the globe.  See Also: Germany just sold 10-year bunds at a negative yield.

Ancillary Benefits: How to drive insane amounts of traffic to your local business using Pokemon Go. Contra: Pokemon Go is actually terrible for the economy.  Here’s why.

Commercial

Bargain Shopping: Brexit could lead to foreigners buying up even more of London as UK real estate funds look to sell assets in order to meet redemptions as the pound continues to weaken.

No Moat: WeWork is the largest player in the co-working space, leading to a much scrutinized, sky-high valuation of $16 Billion for a real estate company.  However, the business is growing and, with very few barriers to entry, competitors are popping up everywhere.  I found this excerpt from the WSJ about valuations vs. barriers to entry particularly interesting (highlights are mine):

Some WeWork investors have compared WeWork with taxi-service provider Uber Technologies Inc. and overnight home-rental provider Airbnb Inc., saying WeWork will transform the office-space market.

But Airbnb and Uber enjoy high barriers to competition. The more drivers and hosts in their networks, the harder it is for an upstart to challenge them.

WeWork, by contrast, leases all its office space itself and then rents it out, making it more like a large hotel operator than a network that connects a buyer and seller—and potentially more susceptible to competition.

If the above is true, and scale isn’t as important as barriers to entry, that $16 billion valuation is looking awfully rich.

Residential

Millennials, They’re Just Like You and Me: Realtors marketing to Millennials are driving traffic to their open houses by advertising that Pokemon characters are present in said houses.

Profiles

Deal of the Century: I used to think that George Steinbrenner’s purchase of the Yankees for $8.8MM (now valued at $1.6 billion) or Al Davis’ purchase of 10% of the Raiders for $18,500 (worth around $800MM today) were the best investments in the history of sports. However, the UFC just surpassed both.  This past week, the Fertitta family and Dana White sold UFC for a whopping $4 billion after having bought it for a mere $2MM a mere 15 years ago.

LOL: Leadership at struggling online lender Sofi has long been highly critical of banks. However, a major slump could force the upstart company to become what it despises the most: a bank.

Podcast of the Day: The Big Man Can’t Shoot from Malcolm Gladwell’s Revisionist History series is 35 minutes long and absolutely worth the listen.  It’s about how Wilt Chamberlain (a historically terrible free throw shooter) started shooting his foul shots underhanded, was incredibly successful at it but then stopped because he was embarrassed.  The episode is much more about human behavior than basketball. I found it fascinating.

Chart of the Day

Remember this chart the next time you read an economic report referencing low productivity:

WTF – Pokemon Go Edition

Everybody’s Searching for Something: Searches for Pokemon porn are up 136% since the launch of Pokemon Go on July 6th.  The more that I learn about people, the more I like my dog.

Dragnet: A woman in Queens, NY used the Pokemon Go app to catch her boyfriend cheating on here when she noticed that he caught a Pokemon at his ex’s house.

Attempted Darwin Award: Two men fell off of a cliff in San Diego on Wednesday while trying to catch a Pokemon.  They both lived, despite their best efforts.  I can’t think of a good way to go but, when it’s my time, I don’t want a video game mentioned as the cause in my obituary.  See Also: Three people, at least one of whom was an adult were locked in a cemetery while playing Pokemon.

Landmark Links – A candid look at the economy, real estate, and other things sometimes related.

Visit us at Landmarkcapitaladvisors.com

Landmark Links July 15th – Proceeding with Caution